t_lamp.gif (970 bytes)
b_lamp.gif (4248 bytes) motto.gif (1959 bytes)
tps.gif (831 bytes)issues.gif (417 bytes)library.gif (560 bytes)contoff.gif (770 bytes)statehouse.gif (553 bytes)congress.gif (510 bytes)search.gif (433 bytes)contribute.gif (517 bytes)press.gif (476 bytes)about.gif (477 bytes)contact.gif (524 bytes)guestbook.gif (526 bytes)email.gif (468 bytes)btm_box.gif (4232 bytes)
Lawmakers Face Legal Battle Over Lottery Plan
by Tom Chansky
From the Ohio News Network, January 15, 2002

An Ohio political group has sued the state over its latest attempt to raise money.

Tuesday, the Ohio Roundtable announced a lawsuit against the state seeking to block Ohio from entering a multi-state lottery, such as Powerball or the Big Game. The Roundtable and other anti-gambling groups say in 1988, the Ohio Attorney General ruled that a lottery run with other states would be unconstitutional. Ohio Roundtable President David Zanotti says the group will spend between $50,000 and $100,000 on radio and television advertisements.

The lawsuit says legislation authorizing the state to join a lottery violates the Ohio Constitution, which prohibits the state from delegating authority over a lottery to other states. The lawsuit seeks a temporary injunction blocking Ohio from joining a multistate lottery.

In September, Governor Bob Taft announced the state was facing a $1.5 billion budget deficit. State lawmakers passed a round of budget cuts and a number of other measures to balance the budget. One of those measures planned for Ohio to join a multi-state lottery. State estimates report Ohio could earn more than $41 million per year with a multi-state lottery. Ohio lottery officials say they lose between $200 million and $300 million each year because Ohioans travel across the border to try to win big jackpots like Powerball.

Governor Taft's office tells ONN the governor will ask Ohio Attorney General Betty Montgomery to fight the lawsuit.

Over the past four years, as multi-state lotteries have seen soaring popularity across the nation, the Ohio Lottery Commission has seen declining revenues.

"The states around us do offer multi-jurisdictional gaming that traditionally has larger jackpots than we have, so all of that leads to a decline in sales for the Ohio Lottery," Mardele Cohen, Spokesperson for the Ohio Lottery tells ONN.

However, anti-gambling groups don't buy the state's argument. Reverend John Edgar, with the Anti-Lottery Commission, says it is horrible public policy to "be selling a product that harms our citizens." Anti-gambling groups say the incentive to win larger jackpots will lead the state to moral and legal problems.

However, lawmakers say they realize the gravity of the situation. Along with passing the multi-state lottery bill, lawmakers tacked on a provision to create a gambling study to determine its effect on the state.

Last year, the University of Cincinnati's Ohio Poll found 53 percent of Ohioans supported the state joining a multi-state lottery. Out of all the people who said they favor the proposal, the largest amount, 29 percent, said that they favor joining a multi-state lottery because it would raise money for education. Of the 39 percent of people opposing the idea, 13 percent said that Ohio's current lottery is not working or that the money does not go to the state's schools.

Ohioans twice voted against casinos statewide votes in 1990 and 1996.

© The Ohio News Network, 2002. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. AP contributed to this report.


ohioroundtable.org is designed and hosted by:
Evergreen Communications