Home > July 2007 > Two Faces in the Stem Cell Debate: Hypocrisy par excellence.

Two Faces in the Stem Cell Debate: Hypocrisy par excellence.
By Dr. Chuck McGowen

Several weeks ago (in blog dated 4-20-07) I reported that a Brazilian team of physician/researchers had successfully stemmed the tide in some newly diagnosed cases of Type I (insulin dependent diabetes) through the harvest and infusion of autologous stem cells derived from the patient’s own bone marrow: known as hematopoetic stem cell transfer. These cells had allegedly taken up the role of the suddenly absented pancreatic beta cell and started producing insulin. While this was only a first step in the process of finding a cure for this very serious disease that shortens the life span of those so afflicted, it was at least a step in the right direction, a light in a dark place. Those researchers are to be commended not condemned.

The word hypocrite is etymologically based upon the Greek word that described an actor in a play; someone pretending to be what he is not; literally two faced. That meaning is depicted on the facades of many playhouses (theaters) throughout the world with a face, half of which is black and half of which is white. Another thespian based word with Latin origins is “sincere.” That compound word arises from two Latin words; sine (meaning without) and cere (meaning wax). To be “without wax” meant that the person making a statement was not wearing a false, wax face used in theatrical productions.

In the July 18, 2007 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) a letter to the editor appeared that adequately expressed the hypocrisy of some who have taken up sides in the debate over the use of stem cells to find cures for numerous diseases currently affecting the quality of life and/or the longevity of humans.

The physician writing that letter bemoaned the fact that the researchers were using children (who are by the way the most frequent victims of this dreaded disease) in their study. He said that the report “raises certain ethical concerns regarding participant selection and study design.” The writer alluded to the Declaration of Helsinki, which addresses medical ethics, and the fact that the declaration requires a legally signed consent form when dealing with “incompetent minors.” He further pointed out that the declaration prohibits research on certain groups unless the general population’s common health is favorably promoted by the study.

To imply that curing Type I diabetes does not improve the heath and/or welfare of the general population is ludicrous. The direct and collateral damage done to the patients and their families in the long term care of diabetic complications in these individuals is too common and well known to deserve further comment.

The real hypocrisy here is to be found in the fact that this doctor, and others like him at the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics and The University of Chicago’s school of medicine have never raised the issue of “informed consent” when it comes to the matter of using any of the 500,000 frozen embryos (also incompetent, fully human minors) in the invitro fertilization labs around this country for stem cell research. The silence in that regard is deafening whenever governments are asked to fund such research.

Instead of applauding the Brazilians for shedding some light on this ground breaking, new technique of using autologous stem cells (which obviates rejection phenomena) in the cure of disease (as opposed to homologous stem cells represented by embryonic, cord blood or amniotic sources that are threatened by rejection), they chose instead to find what they consider a dark side to the study. As a Chinese proverb aptly teaches, “It is always better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.”

Saturday, July 28, 2007, 08:03 AM

Email to a Friend  |  Printer Friendly Page  |  Permalink

Bookmark and Share


Dr. Charles McGowen's Bio

Home

Past Posts

What is scientifically natural about same sex marriage? Nothing!
05/07/13
How does diabetes relate to pancreatic cancer? Don’t ask your attorney.
04/25/13
It is time for Washington to take off the blinders and take notice of what really works in Stem Cell therapy
04/05/13
The Pathophysiology of Christ’s Death
03/21/13
Soda Pop May Be Doing More Than Just Adding Calories
03/12/13
The Proof is not to be found in the Pudding
03/02/13
Archive

June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005


Search this blog: